From Careless To Careful: Grading Practices That Make a Difference   

From Careless To Careful: Grading Practices That Make a Difference  

Children today bring home report cards for their parents review about four times during the school year. Parents can attend two to three parent teacher conferences to receive reports on how their children are doing academically and behaviorally. During these conferences teachers at times communicate to parents that their sons or daughters are doing fine, but they need to take their time with their work because they just seem to make careless mistakes. In reality their children are not doing well academically but for some reason teachers feel that poor student performance is a reflection of their teaching ability, not a student’s work ethic. There is only one way to measure a student’s performance and to determine whether a not they have mastered the material that was taught, and that’s by assigning a grade associated with the work that the student completes. Grades like and A. B. C. or 80%, 90%, or 100% are part of reality and children and parents need to be given a clear idea of whether or not the material that was taught was actually mastered with an appropriate grade assigned.

So, why are children careless? The biggest reason is that teachers from the first grade on accept work that is sub par, and doesn’t communicate the truth to the student or parent that the work submitted is unacceptable. Carelessness just becomes part of life and parents believe their child isn’t academically deficient but just makes careless mistakes, doesn’t pay attention, is a day dreamer, or just plain old lazy. The truth is the child hasn’t mastered the material that was taught.

The way for teachers to resolve the problem is to raise their level of expectation and to put in place more stringent grading practices that give a true indication of the student’s performance. By doing this students will have a better understanding of their abilities, and when taken seriously will motivate the student to pay attention, and to be more careful with the work that is turned in.

Revise – Re-do – Retake  

To start this process any work that that is handed in whether it is homework, class work, tests, or quizzes should never just be handed back to the student with the mistakes noted. The work should be handed back with the mistakes noted and with the understanding that if the student grade was 80% or less the entire assignment must be done again. It may take a few re-do’s but once the student gets the idea that certain grades are unacceptable they will be less careless and more careful when they turn in assignments the first time. This not only motivates the student but gives them the opportunity to master material that would otherwise just be handed back to them with a poor grade. Students must revise writing assignments, re-do, careless work, and retake tests if their grade was 80% or less.

Poor academic performance is a result of students not having the necessary pre requisite skills to perform at a higher level. The only way to resolve the problem is to go back to the academic areas that were not mastered by the student and make them repeat the areas of deficiency until mastered. To a school district this can be costly and create a great deal of parental and community discord. So, by today’s standards that is almost impossible to do. Why not be tougher on students academically the first time around and really get them to master the material that is being taught. Stop using the excuse that the students are careless and start using tougher grading practices that will make students more careful and most of all more responsible for their academic progress..

Learn More

 

 

 

Keys To An Effective In School Suspension Program

Keys To An Effective In School Suspension Program

This idea of in-school suspension has been around since the 1970’s when researchers began propagating the notion that out-of-school suspensions (OSS) were ineffective, and perhaps even detrimental to students. It has been my experience that out of school suspension is only ineffective when the student is left unsupervised in the home while they are suspended, and because the parents don’t hold the child accountable for his poor behavior in school. Students would come back from out of school suspension, without any consequence imposed in the home, and had no fear of being suspended again. The school then has been handed the responsibility of holding students accountable, while the student remained in school for behaviors that they would otherwise be suspended for. For ISS to be successful certain key elements must be in place and the program must be taken seriously by students, teachers, and administration. ISS is not a holding tank and should not be used for that purpose.

While in ISS students should be engaged in the same academic work that they would be completing in the classes that they would have otherwise missed. This prevents students from falling behind and having to play catch up. They should be inspired to change their behavior and work to understand their alternative to the negative behaviors they exhibited in the past, and they need to be educated on what those alternatives might be. In this way ISS becomes an intervention and not punishment.

To learn more about how to conduct an effective in school suspension program

CLICK HERE

 

Anti Bullying 101Podcasts

Bench Notice

Please take the time and listen to my podcast; Anti Bullying 101. It is available on a variety of platforms as well as on the website. For convenience I have provided the platforms below. These podcast are designed to create awareness about the bullying epidemic and provide teachers, administrators, parents and even student’s information about the dangers of bullying and why we have to take a comprehensive approach when dealing with the problem. These platforms provide convenience and allow you to listen to the podcast on a variety of devices and when you are on the go. Please subscribe on the platform of your choice. Thanks for listening.